Archive for June, 2008

Drink and save [the planet]

Jun 28th, 2008 Posted in spirits | no comment »

If you want to save the planet while imbibing — responsibly, of course — you might like to know that Tru Organic Vodka is not only tru-ly [sorry] organic they they are so responsible they have a tree-planting program. (Vodbox in Beverly Hills has already helped plant over 1,000 trees.)

360 Vodka claims to be from “the most energy efficient distillery in America.” AND when you’ve finished, they want to you to “carefully remove the closure and drop it into the prepaid envelope” that hangs from the bottle’s neck by an eco-friendly piece of brown string. OK, I’m almost to the end of the bottle…

Root beer vodka: most fun drink this summer. Really.

Jun 28th, 2008 Posted in spirits | no comment »

Decades ago, after spending a year abroad I got on a flight back to the US and asked for the most American drink I could imagine: root beer.   I was shocked when the flight attendant told me they didn’t carry it. I love root beer.  My father loved root beer. Whenever I see artisanal root beer, I try it – and generally savor my way through it.

But I was skeptical when a bottle of Three Olives Root Beer Flavored Vodka recently came my way.  “Is this a good idea?” I asked myself.  When my friend Kathy came over to watch a chick-flick, we decided to try it.  She is, admittedly, not a drinker but she knows food.  When we cracked open the capsule, a lovely, very authentic root beer-y aroma came wafting out.  Cautiously, we poured a few drops into a glass. Hey – it’s not even sweet, we marveled.  It tasted like root beer in the most appealing – and surprising – manner.  We poured out a little more of the stuff, slipped in a few ice cubes, and the evening was off to a great start!

rant against single vineyards

Jun 21st, 2008 Posted in wine | no comment »

There’s a reason some winemakers are considered great: they know how to blend vinified grapes into great wines.  Blend is the key word here.  And nothing argues more against the current fad for single vineyard wines than some of the single vineyard wines themselves.

Recently, I tasted three single-vineyard wines from a well known Argentina winery, and it was Goldilocks time.  The first one structured but lacking in fruit.  The second fruity but lacking finesse.  The third delicate and sustained but without depth.  After we’d finished, I poured them all together in one glass: Ah, that was more like it.  Even this primitive in-glass “blending” began to exhibit this winery’s great potential.

A few weeks ago I tasted another single vineyard grouping, this one of dessert wines – a category I know well.  Disappointment set in: each vineyard carried its own set of apricot or peach, honey or grapefruit zest aromas and flavors, along with a variety of structural components.  It was an interesting deconstructional analysis for me as a wine writer.  But blended together, the wine would have shown its greatness to everyone.

So what’s with all the praise heaped on single vineyard wines lately? It’s about marketing. Wineries and their promoters periodically need new ways to sell wine, and “Single Vineyard” happens to be the current flavor.  Not that there aren’t some great single vineyard wines.  (Burgundy comes to mind.)  But all too often, single vineyard wines turn out to be the Emperor’s New Clothes.

A QUESTION FOR YOU
Should wine writers warn the public about this?  On one hand, we don’t want to heap artificial praise on wines that don’t deserve it.  On the other hand, is it better to have this faddish hook that gets more people to try more wines?  What do you think?
Email your thoughts to Becky@BeckySueEpstein.com